Why New Human Knowledge Research Journal?
New Human Knowledge Research Journal (Global-Journal) is a peer-reviewed academic and scholarly journal founded on the belief that human knowledge transcends disciplinary boundaries and that original scientific research opens new horizons for understanding humanity, society, and the world.
Our Vision
To become a global scholarly platform for advancing new human knowledge, encouraging original research that moves beyond traditional boundaries, opening innovative pathways for thought, inquiry, and application, and contributing to a more open and integrated future of knowledge.
Our Mission
To empower researchers to make rigorous scholarly contributions, promote dialogue across disciplines and cultures, and facilitate access to knowledge for readers, institutions, and communities within a scholarly publishing environment that combines academic quality, innovation, and responsibility.
Our Philosophy of Scholarly Publishing
We begin with the principle that researchers are responsible for their scholarly work and every word they write, and that trust in their academic integrity is the foundation of our relationship unless evidence proves otherwise. This trust does not conflict with academic peer review; rather, the two complement each other. Rigorous scholarly review safeguards the quality of knowledge, strengthens the reliability of research findings, and gives readers a sound basis for relying on published work.
From this perspective, we have adopted the Unified Smart Scholarly Publishing System, which combines trust in researchers, scholarly peer review in accordance with approved procedures, human editorial responsibility, and the use of technology to simplify technical and administrative processes.
Authors prepare their manuscripts using the approved journal template and submit Word files in .docx format without page numbers, completing their information through the online platform. The editorial board coordinates scholarly assessment and academic peer review, oversees required revisions, and makes decisions regarding acceptance and approval for publication in accordance with established academic standards.
Once the requirements for approval and publication have been fulfilled, the system prepares the PDF file, automatically assigns consecutive page numbers within the relevant volume, issues publication documents, and provides the means to verify their authenticity.
The intelligence of this system does not mean replacing peer review or human responsibility. Rather, it means freeing researchers, reviewers, and editors from repetitive technical tasks so that their efforts can focus on research quality, originality, and scholarly value.
What Makes Our Journal Distinctive?
- Intellectual openness: Encouraging studies that raise new questions and offer original approaches to understanding humanity, society, and the transformation of knowledge.
- Interdisciplinary integration: Supporting dialogue across scientific and humanities disciplines while respecting the methodological foundations and academic standards of each field.
- Trust in researchers: Respecting researchers' academic integrity and responsibility for their work unless evidence demonstrates otherwise.
- Responsible scholarly peer review: Applying academic peer review in accordance with approved procedures, with scientific and editorial decisions remaining in the hands of qualified specialists.
- Smart scholarly publishing: Using technology to prepare, format, and convert manuscripts into approved publication formats and to issue publication documents without compromising academic standards.
- Open access: Making published research freely available for reading and downloading, thereby expanding the dissemination and use of knowledge.
- Transparency and accountability: Clearly communicating publishing procedures, fees, and authors' rights, and addressing scholarly observations and corrections in accordance with the journal's editorial policy.
The Role of People in the Smart Publishing System
Researchers remain the originators of ideas and are responsible for their originality. Peer reviewers remain responsible for specialized scholarly assessment, while the editorial board makes academic and editorial decisions. Technology serves to organize procedures, accelerate production, improve the accuracy of documents, and facilitate access to them.
In this way, technology does not replace scholarly reasoning; it helps researchers and academic professionals devote more effort to inquiry, analysis, critical evaluation, and innovation.
Knowledge Beyond Boundaries
The journal seeks not merely to increase the number of published papers, but to broaden the impact of human knowledge, encourage ideas worthy of reading, discussion, and further scholarly development, and build bridges among researchers, disciplines, and cultures.
We believe that the future of human knowledge is shaped by the minds of researchers, the rigor of scholarly methods, the responsibility of academic institutions, and technologies that open new doors to discovery.